Research@DBTA

Major Vendor Plans to Replace Data Centers with SaaS: Can They Do It?

Brian Cinque, data center architect for Sun Microsystems, intends to put himself out of a job. By 2013, he said in a recent blog post, Sun intends to consolidate 50 percent of its data center footprint, and end up with no data centers within the two years that follow.

Along with SaaS, Sun will employ server virtualization, storage consolidation, and application consolidation strategies. Here’s how Cinque says they will accomplish this:

  • Server Virtualization – “Xen/xVM, Solaris Zones/LDOMS”
  • Storage Consolidation – “Tiered storage, NAS, etc.”
  • Application Consolidation – “For SunIT its called IBIS”
  • WAN acceleration – “Another interesting technology in which its roots have been around for a while.:
  • SaaS – “SaaS plays a huge role. SaaS and mashups are an interesting discussion.”

Sun always has had a flair for the dramatic in its pronouncements, but it will be interesting to see how close it gets to this goal, and what kind of “gotchas” it hits along the way.

Oracle Buys More Middleware; Sun Buys a Database

Two giant enterprise vendors announced they are absorbing major players in the SOA middleware and database worlds. Does this mean more consolidation is on the way? Not necessarily.

On Wednesday, BEA finally accepted a generous bid from Oracle Corporation, at $8.5 billion, far more generous than the measly $6.7 billion offered last fall. In a much smaller deal (only $1 billion), Sun Microsystems announced it is acquiring the largest open source database company on the market, MySQL.

Oracle appears to be evolving into a large assemblage of application and middleware offerings underpinned by a database; while Sun appears to be evolving into a large assemblage of open-source communities underpinned by hardware.

From the Oracle-BEA perspective, it’s now likely that BEA will likely sooner or later be absorbed into Oracle “Fusion” of enterprise software companies. BEA is a big player in the SOA and app server space, so this is not a trivial acqusition for Oracle, which also seeks to dominate this sector. In fact, for Oracle, the ability to dominate SOA middleware is essential to the long-term future of the company. Both Oracle’s bread-and-butter products — its database and ERP suite — could be usurped by functionality moved up into the middleware layer. Companies are alreday finding ways to do end-runs around upgrading these expensive solutions with their own standardized services and interfaces.

Sun appears to be increasingly betting its business on the open source world, with a revenue emphasis on service and servers versus actual software sales. Sun’s two software jewels — its Solaris operating system and Java programming language — have been open sourced. Sun also supports open-source middleware in the form of the Glassfish application server. Add to that the OpenOffice.org offering for desktop productivity systems.

Call it the “JASMO” stack — Java/Apache/Solaris/MySQL/OpenOffice.

From a MySQL customer perspective, the deal puts a large and deep-pocketed support structure behind the open source database. Surveys and interviews we have done here for Unisphere Research and Database Trends & Applications have consistently found a lingering perception open source databases don’t have the support structure that an Oracle or DB2 have behind them — a key crtieria for entreprise customers.

Let’s Reconsider Our Fixation on Data Centers as ‘Cost Centers’

Symantec Corporation just released its annual “State of the Data Center” report, based on interviews and data collected from 900 enterprise sites throughout the world, and found, no surprise, that data centers are squeezed between tight budgets and rising end-user expectations. Looking forward over the coming year, consolidation and virtualization are the watchwords for data centers of all stripes, as managers seek innovative strategies to get more bangs for their bucks.

These are all good strategies, and companies need to do everything they can do keep the costs of data centers from spiraling out of control. However, there’s a tone to this, as well as in similar reports and vendor pronouncements in general, that has a one-dimensional aspect to it.

That is, they still reflect the old-line thinking that data centers are cost centers, and are necessary evils, like taxes and door locks. What is needed is more perspective on the growing contribution data centers are making to the business, in terms of greater agility, on-demand capacity, and improving business time to market. For every dollar invested in data center infrastructure, x number of dollars are returned to the business.

As long as data centers are viewed as cost centers, they will constantly be under pressure to do a lot more with less.

It’s not that organizations aren’t willing to keep accelerating data center expenditures. Overall, in fact, Symantec projects that data center budgets will grow about seven percent over the coming year, which is probably more than any corporate functional area could ask for. However, this is not likely to be anywhere near enough of a funding increase to the cover the rapidly proliferating growth of data and end-users demanding 24×7 availability.

The squeeze is being addressed through a number of cost containment strategies, but the impact is being felt the most in skills and staffing. Tight budgets are putting a damper on managers’ ability to hire enough talent to fulfill growing demands. More than half the data center managers said they are understaffed and are having difficulty finding suitable workers. Plus, about half indicated that retaining good employees is a huge or big problem, and about a third said they were losing people through retirement. Six out of ten said that many employees’ skills tend to be too narrow, or do not match the needs of their positions. Positions most in demand include network security specialists, application systems architects, and systems administrators.

Many organizations address this cost squeeze through outsourcing. In fact, while two out of five organizations outsource at least some IT functions, most do so for cost-saving reasons. (Only eight percent said they outsource to acquire needed skill sets.) Among the most common tasks outsourced are server maintenance, backups, storage management, archiving, and business continuity.

Symantec documented what types of cost-containment activities are prevalent across data centers at this time. The emphasis for data centers over the coming year will be adopting cost-containment strategies that make use of new technologies, including virtualization, and new management approaches, such as those that automate routine processes.

In what must be good news for the IBM mainframe division, server consolidation ranks as the top strategy for cost containment, cited by 75 percent. Virtualization is the second choice of cost-containment strategy, followed by task automation.

Storage is another area ripe for data center cost containment. Symantec found that storage virtualization is a popular strategy, now employed by two out of five data center managers. This covers two forms of virtualization – storage block virtualization, in which blocks of storage capacity on different arrays appear to be part of one storage array; and file virtualization, in which files stored in different locations appear to applications to be part of a single file system

Two out of five sites now have storage resource management (SRM) strategies in place. The great interest in SRM is primarily due to the benefits it provides when managing a mixed-vendor, mixed-device storage environment. In particular, 58 percent of the respondents who were at least considering SRM said it would help simplify management of their storage tiers; 54 percent said it would also help automate many of the manual processes they must now perform. Additional cost-containment strategies being adopted to control storage costs include unified server and storage management, internal “storage as a service” solutions, deduplication, and data lifecycle management.

The Symantec survey did not cover “Green” data center initiatives, which also play a role in cost containment, and can substantially reduce power costs. However, while Green IT initiatives are getting a lot of press, separate surveys find very low adoption rates at this point.

As the survey shows, companies are taking a range of actions to provide more data center services. However, cost containment is only one side of the story. As much corporate energy should be focused on leveraging data center assets as it is on cost cutting. The story that needs more attention is how data centers are no longer simply cost centers; they are engines for business growth.